More like I have no femenine side, I'm 100% masculinity ya hu-man.Your standards of beauty must be stratospherically high.
Pertaining to the topic, anyone else think the pale guy will become a Char clone?
More like I have no femenine side, I'm 100% masculinity ya hu-man.Your standards of beauty must be stratospherically high.
CG characters can look pretty creepy depending on how well they're done. They're pretty hit or miss.Toxicity wrote:Personally, I only pefer for my women to only be humble 3s. 3 dimensional that is.
... What? I think you're confused. Finding girls attractive is a masculinity thing.DuelGundam2099 wrote:More like I have no femenine side, I'm 100% masculinity ya hu-man.
Not when you're all yang and no yin like me; plus they're just drawings.... What? I think you're confused. Finding girls attractive is a masculinity thing.
I'm starting to have doubts since Code Geass and Heroic Age didn't have any.Pertaining to the topic, anyone else think the pale guy will become a Char clone?
Why is this topic becoming about beauty?DuelGundam2099 wrote:More like I have no femenine side, I'm 100% masculinity ya hu-man.Your standards of beauty must be stratospherically high.
Pertaining to the topic, anyone else think the pale guy will become a Char clone?
Why not something like next Lockon?LightningCount wrote:Why is this topic becoming about beauty?DuelGundam2099 wrote:More like I have no femenine side, I'm 100% masculinity ya hu-man.Your standards of beauty must be stratospherically high.
Pertaining to the topic, anyone else think the pale guy will become a Char clone?
Anyway, I think we're looking at the next Athrun/Kira or Lelouch/Suzaku rather than Char.
Because the anime industry is so dependent on tropes and archetypes that characters not fitting into familiar archetypes would be totally out of left field.Destiny_Gundam wrote:Why are we so fixated on shoving characters into archetypes when we don't even know anything about them?
More like almost all forms of fiction and entertainment by this point in human history, not just anime.bullethead wrote: Because the anime industry is so dependent on tropes and archetypes that characters not fitting into familiar archetypes would be totally out of left field.
His expression and design don't seem that much like those of either Kira or Suzaku though. If I had to guess, he's probably more like Lelouch or Char (which actually share a few similarities, for that matter). He might be closer to a "Char" figure in the sense of being the "slightly older or more experienced military rival" to the inexperienced brown-haired hero. But I obviously don't know that for sure.LightningCount wrote: Anyway, I think we're looking at the next Athrun/Kira or Lelouch/Suzaku rather than Char.
Makes sense, just like the sentry turrets in so many shooting games.DuelGundam2099 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qptPYSbbW4E
The grunts are confirmed to be.... Laser spam satellites?
Thundermuffin wrote:SETSUNA: There is no Tomino in this world.
Definitely negative if the ratings and their failure to capture the target audience are any indication.LightningCount wrote:with the mixed (tepid?) reaction to AGE
What's wrong with it? I'll admit it's no Heroic Age or Aquarion Evol, but it seems fine to me.the CGI in this doesn't look all that good so far.
Really bad texturing on the ships and a backdrop that really makes the textures look even cheaper than they already do. It's not Gonzo level bad texturing, but it feels off if they wanted to make it fit seamlessly into the 2D stuff.DuelGundam2099 wrote:What's wrong with it? I'll admit it's no Heroic Age or Aquarion Evol, but it seems fine to me.the CGI in this doesn't look all that good so far.