I kinda went "bleh" on how they started the episode; yeah we get it, FF is a bad@$$ pilot, adding in
even more material to the one-sided fight we saw at the end of episode 5 just to ridiculously highlight his uber skills was just distasteful.
Sure it worked out in the
end, but Mikott and those others were pretty stupid for forcing the situation the way they did. They had absolutely no idea the ECOAS were ready to deal with the situation, and if it weren't for that there'd be a lot of bodies lying around regardless of who came out on top. And acting like your average war-mongering Gundam emo teenager ("they killed our people so screw them!") and bloodthirsty Gundam revenge-ists was less than admirable of them. It doesn't help that we just had an ugly taste of "They killed our families so we'll kill innocent uninvolved civilians!" leaving a bad taste in our mouths the episode before last.
A bit late, but:
Kratos wrote:Second:
But why didn't Angelo take out the bridge crew when things went sour, or open fire in the hangar bay once Frontal was safe in the cockpit with him? If Banagher is no longer necessary, why didn't Frontal kill him? Why didn't the ECOAS commander shoot Frontal when he had the chance? Any of those actions are perfectly logical things to do in those scenarios, and none of those men have shown any issues with doing dirty work when necessary. The Frontal/Angelo stuff in particular really took away from the sense of urgency and made a good chunk of their escape attempt feel half-hearted.
A few things you overlooked when you pointed these out:
Angelo was trying to get the heck out of there without dying. He was one guy in a small room where he couldn't see, against at least five guys with his own guys already neutralized. Sticking around for a gunfight wouldn't have been just tactically unwise, it would have been
stupid.
FF was still trying to persuade Banagher to his view, hence why he reminded him that he's fair game now.
The ECOAS commander didn't shoot FF because he was afraid he'd hit Banagher.