Dendrobium Stamen wrote:It sounds like this is something of a cultural difference between East and West, particularly when the use of the word "canon" enters the discussion. We in Europe and the Americas are predominantly Christian cultures, where "canon" has a very well-defined meaning, coming from the Biblical context. Japan, as I understand it, freely combines two religions, Buddhism and Shinto, mixing and matching the best of both depending on what's appropriate.
I don't know if we can put this all down to deep-seated cultural distinctions. Even in the context of Christian scripture, the Biblical canon isn't supposed to be 100% internally consistent. The key story of the New Testament is told four times in four different ways, and details like Jesus's last words vary from one account to another. These books were included in the canon because they were each considered divinely inspired and authentic, not because they formed a single seamless continuity.
So to make a very dubious analogy, perhaps we could consider the First Gundam movies and TV series to be two slightly different gospels, with Tomino's novels tacked on as a kind of apocrypha. A very crude comparison, but I think it's at least as valid as comparing it to the fusion of Shinto and Buddhism in Japan.
-- Mark
Note: I'm probably walking a line here in terms of discussing religion on this board, but I'm trying to stick to the boring and uncontroversial historical aspects, rather than making claims for or against any particular spiritual beliefs. In any case, this point occurs to me every time someone brings up the word "canon," which seems to happen on a daily basis.
